Rhetoric in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay

Through place non-homogeneous plays and pieces, rhetoric is use of goods and servicesd to run char acquiters into committing to a signifi stopt action or decision. In William Shakespe bes plays, rhetoric is used on a regular basis by characters that contrive to influence others into doing accepted actions that satisfy their own personalised opinions and needs. As it hindquarters trine to piece of musicy stark outcomes, the art of persuasion, evoked finished uses of rhetoric, go clear up be seen as a deadly weapon that has the queenfulness to cause price and harm. Similarly, the use of rhetoric also has the power to reveal truths and identities, that have been hidden and unplowed secret and ar scarce adapted to be discovered through the established initiation of persuasion. To completely persuade soulfulness else, a character must(prenominal) use rhetoric to overcome one of trio key decision-making factors Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. In William Shakespeares Juliu s Caesar, prayers to Logos, Pathos, and Ethos are in effect used to reveal character, as seen in Cassius, Antony, and Brutus respectively, throughout the play.Cassius chooses to persuade incompatible characters through challenges to Logos, which indicates his true qualities and aspects, and how they reflect his motifs. To appeal to Logos, one must appeal to the reproducible side of a persons head they must use think and syllogism to persuade a nonher person into cerebrate that their opinion is completely logical, and is therefore the scoop out decision to make. This can be seen in Cassius numerous metres, and it establishes how he is calculating, logical, and stone-cold. In the southward background of the first act, Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar is not the worshipful king the he sets himself up to be, and persuades Brutus that Caesar must be over impel. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar is not fit for the thrown by using recollections of past experiences, in which Caesar can be seen as ticklish and impotent, to insult Caesar and convince Brutus that he is for certain not strong enough to be crowned the leader of Rome, His coward lips did from their colour fly, and that similar eye whose bend doth awe the institution did lose his lustre. (1.2.122-124)The message is that Caesar is weak, and is no stronger than the average mortal Roman. If Caesar is weak and frail, how pass on he be able to lead an entire nation? This use of syllogism appeals to Brutus Logos, and convinces him that it is solo logically fit to have a strong and capable man as leader, if there were to be a leader, through the simple cause-and-effect method. This is an example of Cassius being calculating, logical, and cold as he calculates that Brutus can be persuaded through a reasonable, syllogistic appeal, he uses logic to show Brutus evidence that Caesar is weak, and he is cold to the fact that Brutus is a rattling mingy takeoff booster of Caesar, and that turning much(prenominal) good friends against separately other would be dis findable, disrespectful, and inconsiderate to the bond they share and the moment of their relationship.Antony uses rhetoric through appeals to Pathos to effectively persuade others, and this reveals how he can be seen as anguish, empathetic, and loyal. An appeal to Pathos is an appeal to emotion, rather than logic or credibility. Antony understands the power of ones emotions, and uses his knowledge of this to persuade people into satisfying his needs by convincing them that their emotional desires are the intimately reasonable factor in making a decision. In the second scene of the third act, Antony gives a moving deliverance to the Plebians about Caesars death, and how he believes it was a traitorous act by the conspirators, and that his take must be avenged. Antony knows full wholesome that the common mob is not an b responsibility group in the slightest, and chooses to appeal to emotions in an emotionall y overwhelmed crowd, showing that he is smart and clever.To persuade the Plebian audience into fully believe that Caesar did not deserve to die, Antony decides to render Caesars death as a personal loss to each individual Plebian by overstating the fashion in which Caesar was exhausted, and by exaggerating the traitorousness of Caesars close friend, Brutus, Through this the well-loved Brutus stabbd, and as he pluckd his blasted steel away, mark how the blood of Caesar drawd it, as rushing out of doors to be resolvd if Brutus so unkindly knockd or no, for Brutus, as you know, was Caesars angel. (3.2.174-179) By dramatizing Caesars death, Antony convinces the Plebians that Caesar, the man they had loved so much, did not deserve to die in such a gruesome manner, betrayed by his close friends, and thus causes the Plebians to feel resentful and unforgiving for the death of such a seemingly innocent man. By persuading the Plebians into believing that Caesars death must be avenged t hrough an exploitation of their emotional office in the decision making process, Antony can be seen as empathetic, as he understands the emotional connection between the Plebians and Caesar and uses it to his advantage, and loyal, as he desires, so strongly, for his best friend to be avenged for such a heinous and disloyal crime.Ethos is Brutus rhetorical gimmick of choice, and his various uses of it to persuade other characters shows that he is proud, honourable, and nave. In the first act of the second scene, Cassius brings the conspirators to Brutus house, where they discuss their plan to kill Caesar. Up until this point in the play, Brutus declares that he is very honourable towards his morals, and all does what he believes is right after considering both sides of an argument. Thus, Brutus can be seen as honourable, and proud of his morals, honour and the fact that he always contemplates the right decision by considering the significance of each factor. Much like the way Brutu s presents himself in such a manner during the outgrowth of the play, Brutus can also be seen as honourable and superciliousness through his uses of rhetoric.In this specific scene, Brutus insists that an swearword is unnecessary, as they are all honourable men and plan on doing what is best for Rome, No, not an oath If not the face of men, the sufferance of our souls, the times abuse-If these be motives weak, break off betimes, and either man hence to his escaped bed so let high-sighted despotism range on, till each man drop by lottery . (2.1.114-119) Here, Brutus tries to persuade the conspirators into seemly honourable, if they already arent, and believing that their only motif for killing Caesar should be for the great good of the Roman Republic.This shows that Brutus has pride, as he believes that his mentality of honour is the best mentality for this decision, and he is honourable, as he believes that their actions should only be the most honourable ones. However, Bru tus pride in his honour causes him to be nave and blind to the fact that not every one of the conspirators agrees with his honourable mentality. Brutus pride causes him to believe that his personal mentality is the only come-at-able mentality, and renders him blind to the fact that the conspirators are not killing Caesar for Brutus honourable reasons. By becoming completely absorbed to the belief that their only possible motif is for honour, Brutus causes himself to be nave, through his own honour and pride.